the CAMP ENRON Report

... gateway to the next Progressive Era?

Some say it's nothing but a train wreck ... roll in the big cranes, clear the track, see what the crew's been smoking. If I thought so, I'd not be writing this ... and if they thought so, they'd not be drumming so hard.

For a brief orientation, see this
Welcome to Camp Enron

Submit Feedback To:
RonKsFeedbag at aol

Camp Enron Archives
01/01/2002 - 02/01/2002 02/01/2002 - 03/01/2002 03/01/2002 - 04/01/2002 04/01/2002 - 05/01/2002 05/01/2002 - 06/01/2002 06/01/2002 - 07/01/2002 07/01/2002 - 08/01/2002 08/01/2002 - 09/01/2002 06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003

(2) All "major" articles of older material have now been imported, some with updates worth perusing. We'll keep it all on the main page for a while, will add a few loose pieces of history, will trim the main page and index the archives for convenience later.


free agent, loose cannon, pointy stick ... taking an imposing analytic toolkit out of the box, over the wall and into the street ... with callous disregard for accepted wisdom and standard English

reading the tea leaves from original angles, we've led with uncannily prescient takes on the federal surplus, the dotcom crash, the "Energy Crisis", the Afghan campaign, the federal deficit.

More where those came from ... stay tuned.

For brief orientation, see this
Welcome to CP

... gateway to the next Progressive Era?

For a brief orientation, see this
Welcome to Camp Enron

Many thanks to Tony Adragna and Will Vehrs, still shouting 'cross the Potomac at QuasiPundit. Early Camp Enron material can be found in QP's Dispatches department.
Thursday, June 06, 2002

--- Andersen Case Goes to Jury ---

Jury began deliberations in DOJ's case of enterprise-level criminal obstruction of justice against Andersen, and any outcome is possible. (See the Chron.)

Early on, we mused that DOJ must have had an ace up its sleeve to bring this case this early ... and if they ever had it, we haven't seen it played. Maybe they expected any one of three key Andersen witnesses to plead and cooperate, rather than taking the 5th.

Andersen partner David Duncan, who already plead "guilty", lost his religion in mid-trial and seemed uncertain whether he was really guilty of anything. A lot of the supporting testimony couod be read either way -- prosecution witnesses coughing up nuggets for the defense, and vice versa.

For the defense, Rusty Hardin must have thought he had a losing case, since he adopted a deliberate "uproar" strategy -- creating chaos in the courtroom, deliberately needling the trial judge into losing composure, and banking on either
(a) creating a perception of judicial bias on the part of any two or more impressionable jurors, or

(b) provoking Judge Harmon into leaving a trail of reversible error.
It's an odd piece. If DOJ prevails, it doesn't stop here ... it's just the start of years of appeals. If DOJ loses, it doesn't stop here ... the substantive fraud cases still lie ahead, and those missing witnesses are marked for special attention. If it's a hung jury, it doesn't stop here. Hardin's good standing as a member of the bar ... maybe that stops here, who can say?

Again, it's a sideshow ... and inside the Big Top, the circus orchestra is just warming up.